
Lyrics: Lyrics: Bounce Back
Video: Stacie Orrico: Bounce Back
i) the pros of genetic testing given in the essay.
(ii) the cons of genetic testing given in the essay.
(iii) are the pros and cons and organized separately or “back and forth".
(iv) Does it have a thesis statement? Could you write a strong / stronger one for the essay.
(v) Does the conclusion state an opinion? Is it a strong one?
(i) of the qualities most resilient people have, and
(ii) the outside influences resilient people often have.
(i) What have scientist discovered about the relationship between one's genetic makeup and one’s experiences?
(ii) How, when and by whom can one’s genetic predisposition be altered?
(iii) do you think social institutions like schools and prisons could make use of this information? Is so, how?
1: What was the author’s thesis statement? Did it express a strong opinion?
2: What was/were the author’s opposing opinion (s) and rebuttal (s)? Was it / were they effective?
3: What examples did the author give? Were they in short phrases or paragraphs? Were they effective? Can you find places where you would have placed more?
4: The author uses an analogy, is it effective?
5: How effective is the overall argument? Are there any points the author makes you disagree with?
1: Why didn't Martin Mooney prepare for this marathon?
2: How has Mooney's life changed, physically and emotionally, since he got his disease?
3: How does Mooney feel about his life?
4: What can you say about the cards Mooney was dealt and how he is playing his hand?
-a topic we covered in class [i.e. genetic testing],
- something related to world politics [e.g. the war in Iraq, Korean unification]
- something spiritual e.g. the existence of god, the evil of eating meat]
- something related to your everyday lives [e.g. the teaching of courses in English at advanced institutions of learning in Korea].
- The choice to make KAIST become an ‘English’ only campus.
- The proposal to do away with special purpose high schools in Korea.
- The demand for people to use degendered language.
- The efficacy of doing experiments on animals for the improvement of products like cosmetics
1: What did the author of this essay give as the basic definition of industrial engineering?
2: Which other defining strategies did the author use?
3: Did you find the examples the author gave interesting?
4: How did the author introduce his essay?
5: Do you feel like you understood industrial engineering well after reading the essay? Why or why not?
1: When the author was a student, what courses do you think he expected to take?
2: What courses did he actually take? Why?
3: What was his original career plan? What career did he actually go into? What might this change tell you about your own course choices in college?
4: By the end of his essay what value does the author give to studying the liberal arts